Building Bridges in Barcelona
I’ve just come back from three days in Barcelona, attending the GUNI 2013 Conference http://www.guninetwork.org/guni.conference/2013-guni-conference/he-conference-2013 on university-community engagement. I went as part of a small team from NCCPE, to promote the newly emerging UK Community Partner Network, which you can read more about here: http://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/about/community-partner-network
I met a really diverse group of people from universities across the globe, whose uniting passion is about enabling the knowledge, skills, research and resources held within universities to be more easily accessible to communities, in order that they themselves can make the changes they feel they want to make, whether it be about social justice, health, women’s issues, heritage or infrastructure.
Some of the projects I learnt about were incredibly challenging and quite beyond my own cultural frame of reference. Other were encouraging and inspiring, as new ways are being found to learn and share across continents and with new technologies.
But perhaps unsurprisingly some of the most effective forms of engagement come through personal relationship: that one-to-one encounter with another human being, who values you and wants to come alongside you so that together you can make a difference to the people around you.
And THAT is where I fit in.
Although much of the language and context of Higher Education is new to me and I’m still finding my way through the jungle of jargon, essentially I see that it’s about valuing people and using our skills to benefit one another. It’s about recognising that each of us has gifts and skills that can be used to a greater purpose, whether or not we have a degree or speak several languages. The ability of each human being to acknowledge the dignity and value of another shouldn’t ever be undervalued.
Policy can affect practice and funding can support practice, but without people there *is* no practice!
I have the privilege of attending the CUExpo in Canada next month, where any of the delegates from Barcelona will also be in attendance. I’m looking forward to continuing this conversation, and finding out more!
Passion for education – making your voice heard
I am passionate about education.
There, I said it. All my cards are on the table.
And I make no apology for it.
Valuing children and young people is a central part of my practice and always has been. I follow news about schools and education closely and with the GCSE crisis in the summer and the proposed KS4 education reform, I was determined to make sure I added my voice – put my money where my mouth is, as it were.
The closing date was today, 10th December. It took me two hours to complete the response form which I had to upload to the website as a Word document. But completing the form required me to also have open a PDF document, which contained the Consultation Report.
The more I think about it, the angrier I feel.
At the end the consultation invited you to feedback on what you thought of the process. Here’s what I wrote:
“This consultation was not, in my opinion very well written or balanced.
1. An average member of the general public would have been very hard pressed to understand and effectively answer the questions presented without any prior knowledge.
2. The consultation paper offered nothing by way of a clear and simple explanation of the terms, implications or intent of the proposals. It was too vague in some places, and yet values towards certain views were clearly implied. In short: it was not objective, and the ‘evidence’ used to justify some of the proposals was not provided.
3. All the questions posed were clearly slanted in one direction, towards an answer most favoured by the Department of Education.
4. The consultation was not easy to find, nor was it widely publicised.
5. The consultation was overly wordy, and having to make reference to the consultation paper as well as the response paper was unnecessarily complicated.”
I am not averse to change – far from it. Review and reform can play an essential role in improving our services. But the more I read it, the more I realised that what was being offered was a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to education, defended by evidence which was not readily available and thinking which was at once vague and woolly but also deliberately provocative.
Here are some other responses I included in my response (items in bold are the questions from the response form). My favourite is question 20, which assumes the new examinations will be reformed and rigorous, without any evidence to prove it…
5 Do you agree that it will be possible to end tiering for the full range of subjects that we will be creating new qualifications for?
I understand the concerns around ‘capping’ GCSEs – I myself took a middle band exam, based on my ability in the subject. However, an exam that seeks to stretch the very able and demonstrate the ‘breadth & depth’ of knowledge required in that subject, cannot possibly offer a positive opportunity for a less able student to also demonstrate the best of their learning and ability.
7 a) We intend that English Baccalaureate Certificates should be assessed 100% by externally marked examinations. Do you agree?
Some pupils thrive under exam conditions, whereas others do not. It offers an unfair advantage to those students who do well in such settings, and in turn an unfair disadvantage and additional pressure on those who find exams stressful and where it is difficult to demonstrate their full knowledge and understanding. Thus I would uphold the necessity of a proportion on internally assessed work.
8 Should our expectation be that English Baccalaureate Certificates take the same amount of curriculum time as the current GCSEs? Or should schools be expected to place greater curriculum emphasis on teaching the core subjects?
Schools are required to provide a broad and balanced curriculum for their students, enabling them to develop a wide range of skills and abilities, as well as deepening their knowledge and understanding. To devote more time in the curriculum to the core subjects would mean that that additional skills and abilities opportunities developed through non-core subjects would be at risk.
These skills and abilities could include:
Project planning
Teamwork
Effective and broad communication including presentation, public speaking
Creative problem-solving
Lateral thinking
Imaginative project development
Emotional intelligence
The majority of activities associated with the core subjects are those that can be completed individually. But in the workplace, a significant number of tasks require teamwork, the ability to understand the small details and the bigger picture, the ability to innovate and bring creative approaches to problem-solving, emotional intelligence (the ability to understand and manage your own emotions and to understand others emotions), personal and spatial awareness, articulation…
Many of these skills and attributes are developed through what are referred to a ‘creative subjects’ although in truth ALL subjects can be approached academically or creatively. Therefore in order to offer a balanced, broad and effective curriculum to students, the time allocated to core subjects must be in balanced with time offered to non-core subjects.
10 Do you agree that these are appropriate subject suites? If not, what would you change? (The suites are English, Maths & Science)
There are a number of subjects missing from the proposed suites of study, including Design Technology, Drama, Art, Music and Physical Performance. These subjects offer students the space to develop a range of skills and abilities which the core subjects do not.
Given that technology is developing at an exponential rate, and that there are roles in the workplace currently which did not exist 5-8 years ago, it is hard to understand why these subject areas are not also included?
For example: the Gaming industry, which employs writers, designers, programmers, mathematicians, physical performers, vocal performers, amongst many others, now generates almost twice the income of the Film industry. Why are we not allowing our students to have the opportunity to gain skills and experience that would enable them to enter this rapidly expanding industry?
12 What qualities should we look for in English Baccalaureate Certificates that will provide evidence that they will support students to be able to compete internationally?
Providing ‘evidence’ that proves high standards on an international level would be difficult because the measurement for such evidence can only be drawn from previous GCSE exam results, which have been judged to be ineffective and failing students. If this is indeed the case, then the only evidence on which to make a decision would come from comparing UK exam results with international ones, which are already perceived to be different?
18 a) Do you believe any of the proposals in this document have the potential to have a disproportionate impact, adverse or positive, on specific pupil groups?
There is the very real possibility that the proposals in the document will adversely affect those whose learning style does not lend itself to courses with 100% examination assessment at the end. The workplace does not place such restrictions on its employees, recognising that a diversity of skills and characteristics are essential to create a thriving economy. Yet these proposals seem to wish to create a ‘one-size-fits-all’ process where all students are viewed, educated and examined in the same way, using the same techniques and offering no variety for the various learning styles and approaches that individuals have. I have serious concerns about the effectiveness of the proposals being put forward. I am not averse to reform and change, but these proposals seem to swing too far in the opposite direction, allowing less room and flexibility for a range of students to demonstrate their skills, knowledge and understanding.
18 b) If they have potential for an adverse impact, how can we reduce this?
Don’t restrict examinations to 100% examination assessment.
Don’t limit the core subjects to those which are solely ‘academic’.
Recognise that a breadth of skills, knowledge and understanding are developed through a diverse curriculum, and not subjects which do not accurately reflect the needs of the modern workplace.
20 How best can we prepare schools for the transition to these reformed, more rigorous qualifications?
I am not entirely convinced that these proposals are as reformed or as rigorous as they are claimed to be. An assessment of their rigour cannot be undertaken until syllabi have been produced and at least 2-3 years of examination results attained, before rigour and effectiveness can be properly assessed.
I am still unclear about what the criteria is for the ‘rigour’ that is often spoken of?
I am unclear about how the proposals meet identified needs in the current and future workplace?
I am unclear about how much ‘breadth and depth’ in subject knowledge will be covered by the EBS, as no syllabi have yet been produced by AOs.
Without answers to these questions, it is difficult to say how schools can be most appropriately supported.
The power of listening
October has seen me pretty much submerged in the Somerstown Stories book, which I’m pleased to see should be finished in the next couple of weeks! It has been a much lengthier, but also much more intriguing process, as I keep unearthing new fascinating facts about the area. More and more people are showing interest in the book and months after the public events finished, we’re still getting new friends through Facebook and Twitter!
In other news, I’m preparing to give a talk to parents of Year 9 students at Portsmouth High School tomorrow evening. I’m delighted to have been invited back again, (this will be the sixth year I’ve given this presentation) and it’s a great opportunity to be able to encourage and affirm parents during one of the toughest phases of parenting. As part of the presentation I always handout a list of Youth Support Services across Portsmouth, who can offer helpful advice and support across a range of issues including mental health, sexual health, substance misuse, independent living, as well as positive activities and engagement. Everyone needs a bit of extra help from time to time, and its great to know that there is such a range of committed, experienced people out there who are willing and able to listen.
The Rig

Artist Chris Jenkins spent a few days at Admiral Lord Nelson school, as part of a Creative Partnerships project. During that time he built this sculpture from recycled materials.
Inspiration can strike at any time and in any place, and The Rig is no exception!
Set on an isolated rig off the coast of California, The Rig tells the story of a handful of unlikely characters and their struggle to survive on a structure that is literally falling apart. Despite battling with the elements and their own personal tragedy, each person comes to find their own small corner of peace aboard this unlikely refuge.
I was inspired to write this piece, after seeing a sculpture created by local artist Chris Jenkins. Chris was working at Admiral Lord Nelson School at the time, taking part in a collaborative residency-style project, funded by Creative Partnerships. Like many of the stories I am working on, this one has been fermenting in my head for a number of months, but I was hit with inspiration for the details of a particular scene and decided to write it up.
Chris’ sculpture is crammed full of unexpected details, which are intriguing and add helpful stimulus whilst trying to write. To me it feels as if the whole things has been made and re-made over and over again, as haphazard repairs have had to be made, using whatever materials could be found.
I’ve written a chapter from the story, which takes place about halfway through the story arc, and you can read it here: The Rig

The Rig is made from recycled materials, many of which had a former life as part of piano, electric components and parts of furniture.
You can find out more about Chris’ work here: http://www.chris-jenkins.com/
Story Telling Club – always nice to be appreciated!
Over the summer I compiled an anthology of original stories written by 6 & 7 year old children from Stamshaw Infants School. They were members of the Story Telling Club, an after-school club which I ran on a voluntary basis for my son’s school.
Around 13 children took part in a series of 5 sessions, and of that number, 10 children managed to complete and illustrate their own unique story (one or two dropped out due to illness or other commitments).
I took the freshly printed books (courtesy of Blurb.com) into school on the first day of term, and the Headteacher was delighted! So much so, that she wrote me a lovely letter, and this is what it said:
“Thank you for the lovely books from the Story Telling Afterschool Club. I felt I must write to say what a wonderful outcome for the children and a special memory for them of their time here at school. It is a superb collection of stories and writing. I really do appreciate all the effort you went to in the organising and ordering of the books.”
Since then staff who have children at the school have also approached me to say how pleased their children were with the books. For my own part I’m very pleased that the children and the school have been so delighted with them, and I hope I get the chance to develop and refine the ideas I trialled at Stamshaw Infants.
Everest Barnstaple III or – writing when the Muse grips you!
I’m meant to be working on a project at the moment, but I confess I’ve been in the grip of a moment of inspiration for a new story, and HAD to write it down.
This has been kicked off by an arts proposal I’ve recently submitted and I realised that unless I got it out of my head there wasn’t much chance of my concentrating effectively on anything else!
But now at last, the first chapter is down, and I can return my focus to my other pieces of work!
I hope you enjoy it – there’s more to come!













